-
1 specific
1. прил.1) общ. особый, специальный2) общ. конкретный; определенный3) общ. специфический, характерный; индивидуальныйfunctions specific to the e-commerce — функции, характерные для электронной торговли
4) общ. определенный; точный5) гос. фин. специфический (о налоге или таможенном тарифе, устанавливаемом в зависимости от физических характеристик товара — количества, веса, размеров, мощности двигателя и т. п., а не как процент от стоимости)Ant:See:2. сущ.1) общ. специальное средство [лекарство\] ( от определенной болезни)2) общ. специфика; мн. особенности, подробности, детали -
2 statement
1) заявление; утверждение; изложение; формулировка2) показания; дача показаний4) отчёт; баланс5) ведомость; расчёт; смета•statement in pleading — 1. заявление при обмене состязательными бумагами 2. заявление, сделанное в состязательной бумаге 3. выступление адвоката в суде;
statement in the nature of confession — конклюдентное признание вины;
statement on oath — заявление под присягой;
statement through interrogation — заявление при допросе;
- statement of actionto take a statement — отобрать заявление;
- statement of charge
- statement of claim
- statement of defence
- statement of fact
- statement of facts
- statement of law
- statement of motivation
- statement of novelty
- statement of offence
- statement of opposition
- statement of particulars
- statement of prosecution
- statement of the accused
- statement of the cause of action
- statement of venue
- admissible statement
- admittedly true statement
- admittedly untrue statement
- affidavit statement
- agreed statement of facts
- anonymous statement
- ante-mortem statement
- average statement
- birth statement
- bona fide statement
- budget statement
- carrier's statement
- consistent statement
- contradicting statement
- damning statement
- defamatory statement
- direct statement
- dying statement
- expert's statement
- extrajudicial statement
- false statement
- financial statement
- follow-up statement
- former statement
- hearsay statement
- immaterial statement
- impugnable statement
- impugned statement
- inciting statement
- inconsistent statement
- incontradictory statement
- initial statement
- instigating statement
- joint statement
- jurisdictional statement
- last statement
- legal statement
- libellous statement
- mutinous statement
- negative statement
- opening statement
- oral statement
- original statement
- out-of-court statement
- parol statement
- partial statement
- police statement
- positive statement
- pre-imposition statement
- pre-testamentary statement
- previous statement
- procuring statement
- prompting statement
- proving statement
- provocating statement
- recorded statement
- reported statement
- riotous statement
- salvage statement
- seducing statement
- self-contradicting statement
- signed statement
- slanderous statement
- specific statement
- sworn statement
- treacherous statement
- treasonous statement
- true statement
- unsigned statement
- unsworn statement
- untrue statement
- valuable statement
- valueless statement
- without-prejudice statement
- written statement
- contradictory statement
- extralegal statement
- prior statement
- provocative statement
- self-contradictory statement -
3 specific
1. n специальное, специфическое средство, лекарство от определённой болезни2. n специальное сообщение3. n детали, подробностиthe legal and financial specifics of independence — конкретные юридические и финансовые вопросы, связанные с получением независимости
4. a особый, специальный5. a конкретныйspecific offence — конкретное, данное преступление
specific act — конкретное действие, деяние
6. a характерный, специфическийspecific tariff — специфический тариф; специфическая пошлина
7. a точный, определённый, ограниченный8. a мед. специфическийspecific medicine — специфическое средство, лекарство от определённой болезни
9. a биол. видовой10. a физ. удельныйСинонимический ряд:1. distinctive (adj.) distinctive; individual; unique2. express (adj.) categorical; clean-cut; clear-cut; decided; definite; definitive; explicit; express; positive; unambiguous; unequivocal3. special (adj.) certain; distinct; especial; exact; particular; precise; set; special4. detail (noun) detail; fact; item; particularАнтонимический ряд:common; general; indefinite; nonspecific; unspecific; unspecified; vague -
4 tombstone
Fina notice in the financial press giving details of a large lending facility to a business. It may relate to a management buyout or to a package that may include interest rate cap and collars to finance a specific package. More than one bank may be involved. Although it may appear to be an advertisement, technically in most jurisdictions it is regarded as a statement of fact and therefore falls outside the advertisement regulations. The borrower generally pays for the advertisement, though it is the financial institutions that derive the most benefit. -
5 Language
Philosophy is written in that great book, the universe, which is always open, right before our eyes. But one cannot understand this book without first learning to understand the language and to know the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and the characters are triangles, circles, and other figures. Without these, one cannot understand a single word of it, and just wanders in a dark labyrinth. (Galileo, 1990, p. 232)It never happens that it [a nonhuman animal] arranges its speech in various ways in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. (Descartes, 1970a, p. 116)It is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even excepting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming of them a statement by which they make known their thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect and fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same. (Descartes, 1967, p. 116)Human beings do not live in the object world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent unconsciously built on the language habits of the group.... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation. (Sapir, 1921, p. 75)It powerfully conditions all our thinking about social problems and processes.... No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached. (Sapir, 1985, p. 162)[A list of language games, not meant to be exhaustive:]Giving orders, and obeying them- Describing the appearance of an object, or giving its measurements- Constructing an object from a description (a drawing)Reporting an eventSpeculating about an eventForming and testing a hypothesisPresenting the results of an experiment in tables and diagramsMaking up a story; and reading itPlay actingSinging catchesGuessing riddlesMaking a joke; and telling itSolving a problem in practical arithmeticTranslating from one language into anotherLANGUAGE Asking, thanking, cursing, greeting, and praying-. (Wittgenstein, 1953, Pt. I, No. 23, pp. 11 e-12 e)We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages.... The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality but is constrained to certain modes of interpretation even while he thinks himself most free. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 153, 213-214)We dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages.The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar or can in some way be calibrated. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 213-214)9) The Forms of a Person's Thoughts Are Controlled by Unperceived Patterns of His Own LanguageThe forms of a person's thoughts are controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of which he is unconscious. These patterns are the unperceived intricate systematizations of his own language-shown readily enough by a candid comparison and contrast with other languages, especially those of a different linguistic family. (Whorf, 1956, p. 252)It has come to be commonly held that many utterances which look like statements are either not intended at all, or only intended in part, to record or impart straightforward information about the facts.... Many traditional philosophical perplexities have arisen through a mistake-the mistake of taking as straightforward statements of fact utterances which are either (in interesting non-grammatical ways) nonsensical or else intended as something quite different. (Austin, 1962, pp. 2-3)In general, one might define a complex of semantic components connected by logical constants as a concept. The dictionary of a language is then a system of concepts in which a phonological form and certain syntactic and morphological characteristics are assigned to each concept. This system of concepts is structured by several types of relations. It is supplemented, furthermore, by redundancy or implicational rules..., representing general properties of the whole system of concepts.... At least a relevant part of these general rules is not bound to particular languages, but represents presumably universal structures of natural languages. They are not learned, but are rather a part of the human ability to acquire an arbitrary natural language. (Bierwisch, 1970, pp. 171-172)In studying the evolution of mind, we cannot guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to, say, transformational generative grammar, for an organism meeting certain other physical conditions characteristic of humans. Conceivably, there are none-or very few-in which case talk about evolution of the language capacity is beside the point. (Chomsky, 1972, p. 98)[It is] truth value rather than syntactic well-formedness that chiefly governs explicit verbal reinforcement by parents-which renders mildly paradoxical the fact that the usual product of such a training schedule is an adult whose speech is highly grammatical but not notably truthful. (R. O. Brown, 1973, p. 330)he conceptual base is responsible for formally representing the concepts underlying an utterance.... A given word in a language may or may not have one or more concepts underlying it.... On the sentential level, the utterances of a given language are encoded within a syntactic structure of that language. The basic construction of the sentential level is the sentence.The next highest level... is the conceptual level. We call the basic construction of this level the conceptualization. A conceptualization consists of concepts and certain relations among those concepts. We can consider that both levels exist at the same point in time and that for any unit on one level, some corresponding realizate exists on the other level. This realizate may be null or extremely complex.... Conceptualizations may relate to other conceptualizations by nesting or other specified relationships. (Schank, 1973, pp. 191-192)The mathematics of multi-dimensional interactive spaces and lattices, the projection of "computer behavior" on to possible models of cerebral functions, the theoretical and mechanical investigation of artificial intelligence, are producing a stream of sophisticated, often suggestive ideas.But it is, I believe, fair to say that nothing put forward until now in either theoretic design or mechanical mimicry comes even remotely in reach of the most rudimentary linguistic realities. (Steiner, 1975, p. 284)The step from the simple tool to the master tool, a tool to make tools (what we would now call a machine tool), seems to me indeed to parallel the final step to human language, which I call reconstitution. It expresses in a practical and social context the same understanding of hierarchy, and shows the same analysis by function as a basis for synthesis. (Bronowski, 1977, pp. 127-128)t is the language donn eґ in which we conduct our lives.... We have no other. And the danger is that formal linguistic models, in their loosely argued analogy with the axiomatic structure of the mathematical sciences, may block perception.... It is quite conceivable that, in language, continuous induction from simple, elemental units to more complex, realistic forms is not justified. The extent and formal "undecidability" of context-and every linguistic particle above the level of the phoneme is context-bound-may make it impossible, except in the most abstract, meta-linguistic sense, to pass from "pro-verbs," "kernals," or "deep deep structures" to actual speech. (Steiner, 1975, pp. 111-113)A higher-level formal language is an abstract machine. (Weizenbaum, 1976, p. 113)Jakobson sees metaphor and metonymy as the characteristic modes of binarily opposed polarities which between them underpin the two-fold process of selection and combination by which linguistic signs are formed.... Thus messages are constructed, as Saussure said, by a combination of a "horizontal" movement, which combines words together, and a "vertical" movement, which selects the particular words from the available inventory or "inner storehouse" of the language. The combinative (or syntagmatic) process manifests itself in contiguity (one word being placed next to another) and its mode is metonymic. The selective (or associative) process manifests itself in similarity (one word or concept being "like" another) and its mode is metaphoric. The "opposition" of metaphor and metonymy therefore may be said to represent in effect the essence of the total opposition between the synchronic mode of language (its immediate, coexistent, "vertical" relationships) and its diachronic mode (its sequential, successive, lineal progressive relationships). (Hawkes, 1977, pp. 77-78)It is striking that the layered structure that man has given to language constantly reappears in his analyses of nature. (Bronowski, 1977, p. 121)First, [an ideal intertheoretic reduction] provides us with a set of rules"correspondence rules" or "bridge laws," as the standard vernacular has it-which effect a mapping of the terms of the old theory (T o) onto a subset of the expressions of the new or reducing theory (T n). These rules guide the application of those selected expressions of T n in the following way: we are free to make singular applications of their correspondencerule doppelgangers in T o....Second, and equally important, a successful reduction ideally has the outcome that, under the term mapping effected by the correspondence rules, the central principles of T o (those of semantic and systematic importance) are mapped onto general sentences of T n that are theorems of Tn. (P. Churchland, 1979, p. 81)If non-linguistic factors must be included in grammar: beliefs, attitudes, etc. [this would] amount to a rejection of the initial idealization of language as an object of study. A priori such a move cannot be ruled out, but it must be empirically motivated. If it proves to be correct, I would conclude that language is a chaos that is not worth studying.... Note that the question is not whether beliefs or attitudes, and so on, play a role in linguistic behavior and linguistic judgments... [but rather] whether distinct cognitive structures can be identified, which interact in the real use of language and linguistic judgments, the grammatical system being one of these. (Chomsky, 1979, pp. 140, 152-153)23) Language Is Inevitably Influenced by Specific Contexts of Human InteractionLanguage cannot be studied in isolation from the investigation of "rationality." It cannot afford to neglect our everyday assumptions concerning the total behavior of a reasonable person.... An integrational linguistics must recognize that human beings inhabit a communicational space which is not neatly compartmentalized into language and nonlanguage.... It renounces in advance the possibility of setting up systems of forms and meanings which will "account for" a central core of linguistic behavior irrespective of the situation and communicational purposes involved. (Harris, 1981, p. 165)By innate [linguistic knowledge], Chomsky simply means "genetically programmed." He does not literally think that children are born with language in their heads ready to be spoken. He merely claims that a "blueprint is there, which is brought into use when the child reaches a certain point in her general development. With the help of this blueprint, she analyzes the language she hears around her more readily than she would if she were totally unprepared for the strange gabbling sounds which emerge from human mouths. (Aitchison, 1987, p. 31)Looking at ourselves from the computer viewpoint, we cannot avoid seeing that natural language is our most important "programming language." This means that a vast portion of our knowledge and activity is, for us, best communicated and understood in our natural language.... One could say that natural language was our first great original artifact and, since, as we increasingly realize, languages are machines, so natural language, with our brains to run it, was our primal invention of the universal computer. One could say this except for the sneaking suspicion that language isn't something we invented but something we became, not something we constructed but something in which we created, and recreated, ourselves. (Leiber, 1991, p. 8)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Language
-
6 Thing
1. n сканд. ист. тинг2. n вещь; предметto be more interested in things than in human beings — интересоваться вещами больше, чем людьми
generic thing — вещь, определяемая родовыми признаками
3. n атрибутыthings Japanese — всё японское; всё, что имеет отношение к Японии
4. n l5. n имуществоthing incorporeal — нематериальная вещь, имущество, заключающееся в правах
6. n вещи, багаж7. n часто носильные вещи; одежда, предметы одежды8. n еда; питьёsweet things — сладости, сласти
9. n обыкн. разг. принадлежности; утварь; предметы обиходаcooking things — кухонная утварь, кухонные принадлежности
10. n рассказ; анекдот11. n вещь, явление12. n обыкн. обстоятельства, обстановкаtell me how things go ? — расскажите мне, как идут дела?
as things go now — при сложившихся обстоятельствах, при нынешнем положении дел; в сложившейся обстановке
that things should have come to this! — подумать только, до чего дошло дело !
13. n делоI have several things to attend to — мне нужно кое-что сделать; у меня ещё есть дела
he gets things done on — добивается своего, он умеет делать нечто, что-то
he says the first thing that comes into his head — он говорит первое, что взбредёт ему на ум
something must be done to stop this sort of thing — необходимо что-то предпринять, чтобы прекратить такие вещи
neither one thing, nor another — ни то, ни другое
one thing or the other — либо то, либо другое
what with one thing and another — то одно, то другое — хлопот не оберёшься
the important thing to remember — то, что важно запомнить; важно запомнить то …
the best thing is … — самое лучшее …, лучше всего …
to say the right thing — сказать то, что надо
the thing is — дело в том; что
14. n деталь, особенностьthe thing is … — всё дело в том …; суть дела состоит в том …
15. n действие, поступокI did no such thing — я не делал ничего подобного; я и не думал делать этого
square thing — честная сделка; честный поступок
16. n событие17. n существо; созданиеlittle thing — малютка, крошка
18. n разг. в обращении человек19. n сущ. разг. пренебр. в сочетании с предшествующим уродливая вещьin all things — во всех отношениях, во всём
and things — и другое, и тому подобное
sure thing — наверняка, конечно; само собой
near thing — опасное положение;
no such thing — ничего подобного; ничто не может быть дальше от истины
no great things — ничего особенного, так себе; не бог весть что
first thing — прежде всего; первым долгом; перво-наперво
for one thing — прежде всего; начать с того, что; для начала
for another thing — кроме того; во-вторых
of all things — ну и ну!, вот тебе и на!, надо же!, подумать только!
above all things — прежде всего; больше всего, главным образом
as a general thing — обычно, как правило
it is too much of a good thing — хорошенького понемножку; это уж слишком
to know a thing or two — знать кое-что; понимать что к чему
to be up to a thing or two — кое в чём разбираться, кое-что знать
Синонимический ряд:1. action (noun) accomplishment; act; action; deed; doing; feat2. being (noun) being; creature; entity; existence; existent; individual; material; something; stuff; substance3. fashion (noun) bandwagon; chic; craze; cry; dernier cri; fad; fashion; furore; mode; rage; style; ton; trend; vogue4. fetish (noun) fetish; fixation; mania; obsession5. gadget (noun) contraption; contrivance; gadget; jigger6. matter (noun) affair; matter7. object (noun) affair; business; commodity; concern; device; doohickey; fact; manifestation; matter; object; shooting match8. occurrence (noun) circumstance; episode; event; go; happening; incident; occasion; occurrence9. point (noun) article; detail; element; item; particular; point; statement; thought10. things (noun) belongings; effects; goods; possessions; things
См. также в других словарях:
specific — spe*cif ic (sp[ e]*s[i^]f [i^]k), a. [F. sp[ e]cifique, or NL. spesificus; L. species a particular sort or kind + facere to make. Cf. {specify}.] 1. Of or pertaining to a species; characterizing or constituting a species; possessing the peculiar… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Specific character — specific spe*cif ic (sp[ e]*s[i^]f [i^]k), a. [F. sp[ e]cifique, or NL. spesificus; L. species a particular sort or kind + facere to make. Cf. {specify}.] 1. Of or pertaining to a species; characterizing or constituting a species; possessing the… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Specific disease — specific spe*cif ic (sp[ e]*s[i^]f [i^]k), a. [F. sp[ e]cifique, or NL. spesificus; L. species a particular sort or kind + facere to make. Cf. {specify}.] 1. Of or pertaining to a species; characterizing or constituting a species; possessing the… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Specific duty — specific spe*cif ic (sp[ e]*s[i^]f [i^]k), a. [F. sp[ e]cifique, or NL. spesificus; L. species a particular sort or kind + facere to make. Cf. {specify}.] 1. Of or pertaining to a species; characterizing or constituting a species; possessing the… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Specific gravity — specific spe*cif ic (sp[ e]*s[i^]f [i^]k), a. [F. sp[ e]cifique, or NL. spesificus; L. species a particular sort or kind + facere to make. Cf. {specify}.] 1. Of or pertaining to a species; characterizing or constituting a species; possessing the… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Specific heat — specific spe*cif ic (sp[ e]*s[i^]f [i^]k), a. [F. sp[ e]cifique, or NL. spesificus; L. species a particular sort or kind + facere to make. Cf. {specify}.] 1. Of or pertaining to a species; characterizing or constituting a species; possessing the… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Specific inductive capacity — specific spe*cif ic (sp[ e]*s[i^]f [i^]k), a. [F. sp[ e]cifique, or NL. spesificus; L. species a particular sort or kind + facere to make. Cf. {specify}.] 1. Of or pertaining to a species; characterizing or constituting a species; possessing the… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Specific legacy — specific spe*cif ic (sp[ e]*s[i^]f [i^]k), a. [F. sp[ e]cifique, or NL. spesificus; L. species a particular sort or kind + facere to make. Cf. {specify}.] 1. Of or pertaining to a species; characterizing or constituting a species; possessing the… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Specific name — specific spe*cif ic (sp[ e]*s[i^]f [i^]k), a. [F. sp[ e]cifique, or NL. spesificus; L. species a particular sort or kind + facere to make. Cf. {specify}.] 1. Of or pertaining to a species; characterizing or constituting a species; possessing the… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Specific performance — specific spe*cif ic (sp[ e]*s[i^]f [i^]k), a. [F. sp[ e]cifique, or NL. spesificus; L. species a particular sort or kind + facere to make. Cf. {specify}.] 1. Of or pertaining to a species; characterizing or constituting a species; possessing the… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Statement analysis — is a learned technique, utilised to examine a person s words todetect for concealed information, missing information and whether the information that person provided is true or false. Anytime someone who is lying or withholding sensitive… … Wikipedia